75133

75134

75135

75137

75138

75140

75141

75142

Some new images of 2016 Star Wars sets in the link below from Brickset.

http://brickset.com/article/17530/images-of-2016-star-wars-sets-and-minifigs

No good news for people who invested in Sandcrawler I think. 

Edited November 7, 201510 yr by Ciglione

I never thought the figs were the selling point in the Sandrcrawler... It was obvious we were getting some jawas and c3po at some point.

Wow - They really beefed up that Escape Pod.

75134 is a pretty nice assortment.

4 hours ago, KShine said:

Wow - They really beefed up that Escape Pod.

Yep..My first thought.  The old one just took a crap.  LOL

3 minutes ago, Ed Mack said:

Yep..My first thought.  The old one just took a crap.  LOL

I'm glad I let mine go for $53 each.

I am disappointed they did not change the color of C-3PO leg to half gold half light grey.  They have the technology to do dual color print on a leg pieces (ex. Chima)

 

ETA: Just to clarify, the leg has a sliver of silver printed, but IMHO it should be from the "knee" down to foot, just like the source material

9490 will still be ok, dirty Sandtroopers are still exclusive

5 minutes ago, roxio said:

9490 will still be ok, dirty Sandtroopers are still exclusive

Good point.

If anything taking a beating, it is going to be the price of Boba Fett minifig from SlaveI

 

Looks like there is a lever on the Carbon Freezing Chamber set that probably lowers Han down into the chamber.  So the set might be a bit more technical then it looked like from the original pics.

Got to admit, these pictures make these sets look better that the first pics that came out.  I also really like all the battle packs, especially the Ep7 ones.  

I don't think these affect the UCS sandcrawler...as that set is all about the incredible build.  I'll probably add most of these to the collection....

1 hour ago, Darth_Raichu said:

If anything taking a beating, it is going to be the price of Boba Fett minifig from SlaveI

 

Well... if after five o'clock he turns into Boba Fettish he will be ok.

Edited November 7, 201510 yr by Ciglione

What's going on with these yellow faced minifigs in the one battleback? Is this like a visor? Or aliens? Thought for a moment the classic yellow minifig head is back in business with SW ;-)

4 hours ago, KShine said:

Wow - They really beefed up that Escape Pod.

The first Droid Escape was simply C-3PO & R2 with a rather ridiculously oversized pod that didn't look good or match the material well, second version was much better and included Sandtroopers, this edition though beats everything far the build goes that finally matches the source in size, shape, and playability I imagine. The prior two are very fat and too conical by comparison. Still may not be perfect but easily the best. Anyway parts themselves are good as are the Jawas.

Supposedly a 'leak' of the minifigure based on a character called Maz Kanata from The Force Awakens.

9 minutes ago, TheOrcKing said:

Supposedly a 'leak' of the minifigure based on a character called Maz Kanata from The Force Awakens.

AKA, really old Lobot

1 hour ago, TheOrcKing said:

Supposedly a 'leak' of the minifigure based on a character called Maz Kanata from The Force Awakens.

 

1 hour ago, exciter1 said:

AKA, really old Lobot

Looks more like an Asgard aka Anunnaki aka Grey...your typical alien friend. Although I see the Lobot. Let's see what we have frozen in the labs.

Cross Lobot with Yoda, and add a touch of Hondo.

That looks like ET's mom.

Oh another short alien that teaches a young Skywalker about the force 

Cheap Jawas to populate my Sandcrawler thanks Lego.  

29 minutes ago, Pseudoty said:

Cheap Jawas to populate my Sandcrawler thanks Lego.  

Finally, now if I just had an easier way to get more Tusken Raiders.

23 minutes ago, exciter1 said:

Finally, now if I just had an easier way to get more Tusken Raiders.

what, buying a bunch of T-16s just for the Tusken isn't cost effective?

4 minutes ago, thoroakenfelder said:

what, buying a bunch of T-16s just for the Tusken isn't cost effective?

For some maybe, not for me. :)