I don't think that they're actively trying to get rid of sellers, but are becoming more and more focused on making the system run as efficiently as possible. Putting aside the compliance document requests, so much of what they've done over the last few years seems designed to creates incentives or disincentives for seller behaviors that cost them money. For example, I imagine that the process of having their staff sticker inventory as it comes into a FC is pretty inefficient and that their throughput would increase dramatically if sellers did more of it...so they jack the sticker charge up. They don't want to have a ton of their storage capacity eaten up with stale inventory just sitting around so they impose restock limits and jack up long-term storage fees. Etc., etc. I'm just guessing and have no inside knowledge, but that's what's made sense to me over the past few years.