Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/21/2016 in all areas

  1. Han's just looking for the cheese wedge he dropped.
    16 points
  2. Started putting up the Elves dragons in my daughter's room. This is the first one to go up...
    11 points
  3. I would love to see a Creator sized version of this iconic building. Castle looks great as well.
    9 points
  4. Just in case everyone wasn't annoyed enough.
    8 points
  5. Is this where I bring up Series 1 Mixels? /runs and ducks for cover
    6 points
  6. If LEGO had never licensed Star Wars - none of us would be here.
    6 points
  7. I got a 10188 Death Star for only $420 today! I guess nobody told the seller that this thing just retired a few months ago!!
    5 points
  8. It's back...Akro-Mils 10124 24 Drawer Plastic Parts Storage Hardware and Craft Cabinet, 20-Inch x 16-Inch x 6.5-Inch, Black - $19.97 (50% off)
    5 points
  9. A little over half way. Lots of tiny pieces. About as wide as the castle
    5 points
  10. LEGO has been lazy, and cutting corners 9 times out of 10 lately, regardless of the theme (not just limited to Star Wars). With a never ending series of SW movies coming, it is still the theme to be in. Now if LEGO (that is LEGO, not the designers who I am certain would love to be creating beautiful sets) decides to continue making crap, that is on them.
    4 points
  11. I think most of these conversations in this thread are emotionally based. My original thought on the 10188/75159 was that it is ONE set...The longest running production set of all time. It must have made money for LEGO...a lot of money to be around so long. It is special. So special that LEGO decided to freshen it up a bit a roll it out once again. We all get it. We understand why LEGO wants to give this set another couple of years. It's a quick refresh and repackaging and thousands more will be sold. I think it is a wasted opportunity though. LEGO really could have done something wonderful...a true showpiece. It could have been a massive 5000-6000 piece set that would have displayed beautifully in every LEGO store across the world. People would have paid $500-$600 or more for something special. Now, many (...and I mean many of the true LEGO fans with money) will blow off the new set and rightfully so. Why? They have it. Personally, I will move onto other sets and themes...less and less STAR WARS sets by the way. With the exception of a handful of sets in the theme, the sets are just not that interesting or well done. Flashy boxes don't hide weak designs. LEGO is getting lazy with this theme. There are so many vehicles and characters that could get UCS treatment and are ignored for retreads. The future of LEGO investing does not lie with the STAR WARS theme in my opinion and that is coming from a guy with thousands of STAR WARS sets. What's next? Another Snowspeeder and Falcon? Another Imperial Star Destroyer? How about a UCS C-3PO? An AT-AT? A Venator? A Landspeeder? Mos Eisley Cantina? I can go on. There are a lot of smart people on this forum and many of us feel disappointed in this ONE particular set. I won't be disappointed in another UCS Falcon. I expect it. I just hope it is BETTER than the original...way better. That's all that I ask.
    4 points
  12. And here's what my son and I have been working on for the last week. I gotta say that it was an excellent build. I really enjoyed how it was put together. I don't even care if it's not screen accurate. It's a well designed build.
    4 points
  13. I thought he'd gone big on 10188's and was going to jump after seeing 75159 pics
    4 points
  14. I thought Han looked like a reseller being bent over by TLG.
    4 points
  15. They sold out Denmark...They are just like the rest...Mexico and China are their allies now.
    4 points
  16. I just got the most recent BLOCKS magazine with my monthly article in it. Great magazine...My article "looked" great. It was about the 10188 and was written several months ago. I wrote about the 75159's possible influence on the 10188. I assumed that it was a completely different set. I sure look like an a s s now.
    4 points
  17. I love me some Mixels. Still need series 1, but my boys and I have the other seven series.
    4 points
  18. Lets just hope Disney doesn't want to make a cheese-slope-SSD next or the only trip we all are going to be making is to the TRUs parking lot.
    4 points
  19. This took longer than I expected because I'm color blind according to my kids and don't know the difference between black and grey. Only had to partially dissemble 3 times to do a swap out. I will building the b model.
    4 points
  20. So I went full Star Wars geek and did some research. Apparently Eclipse I SSD was destroyed about 5-6 years after the Battle of Endor in ROTJ. The Eclipse II SSD was destroyed a few years after its sister ship. The events of TFA take place about 30 years after ROTJ. I guess it's possible that the First Order builds another ship of the Eclipse Class SSD, that might get featured in Episode VIII or IX. ________________________________ I'd take any of these previously released sets if given the UCS treatment.
    3 points
  21. 3 points
  22. Star Wars may perhaps be the center of your Lego universe, but it is not the lynchpin for the entire Lego universe by any stretch of the imagination. Why exactly do you think the City, Technic, Princess, Friends, and Juniors sets will "fall" if the sheen comes off of the Star Wars theme?
    3 points
  23. I probably should have never sold all the S1 I had.
    3 points
  24. "When my grandfather designed the 10188, they didn't have the advanced building techniques and elements we have available today. Please keep in mind that we didn't take advantage of either of those things, but at least they were available to us."
    3 points
  25. For a second I thought oh crap not this one too...
    3 points
  26. I bought a used one so I didn't have to apply the stickers. LOL
    3 points
  27. I am no longer confident in long term holding of this company's products. After the Toy Shop and 10188 fiasco it is clear nothing is out of bounds. This company is either hell bent on destroying the secondary market or is completely clueless. In either scenario the risk of long term holding just went through the roof. I will be selling my UCS Falcon. Grand Carousels, Tajs and Eiffel Towers this shopping season. I love my collectibles, but I love my money even more. Already scaled back my buying this year to just 10% of what I did in 2015 and 5% of 2014, and it will be even less in 2017. Once I sell my 2014 stash in a few years I dumping that into rental properties and sticking to scummy quick flip practices within the return window for Lego products. There are quite a few here in the Northwest who are cutting back big time as well. I will still enjoy building a set from time to time but as investment material it just got downgraded heavily by me. Lego is printing way too many pieces these days for my liking and is clearly out of touch with the secondary market. They will still make their billions, just not at my expense.
    3 points
  28. Not a good pic but I just finished my UCS falcon last night. Decided to get a few friends together. Lol
    3 points
  29. With everyone posting their collections earlier this week, I decided to post how mine currently looks. I am likely building the Porsche with within a few weeks so will have to move things around. Enjoy!
    3 points
  30. I think Trump should choose his hairdresser as his Vice-president, because that person KNOWS how to take on the tough issues. If they can handle that mess they can handle anything.
    2 points
  31. Yes, by policy, but sometimes the cooperativeness and manager discretion varies store-to-store. YMMV
    2 points
  32. Maybe I'm a minority but I feel like the best sets lately have been SuperHero. Maybe not the 300-500 dollar range but from 19.99+ I've enjoyed the SH releases year to date over the SW. I find myself buying literally every Marvel set released this year. Maybe 25% of the SW sets (for personal collection) Maybe they feel Star Wars sets are to big to fail so they shifted their "creative team" to other series.
    2 points
  33. Usually people don't hoard those duds. Last dud I remember everybody and their grandma hoarded was 6857 "The Dynamic Duo Funhouse Escape" I still have a dozen of those but at $35-$45 they hardly even matter... In contrast 10188 was super hoarded by almost everybody here. You are seeing the mass exodus in craigslist ebay and amazon. Sure some people got it way under MSRP and selling now at MSRP might not break their bank but the whole thing is a major blow to the reseller/investor/collector communities in general. It does not matter if you don't have a stash of 10188 in your closet. Every single one of us is being affected by this poor LEGO-Disney idea of a UCS set.
    2 points
  34. I guess nobody told the buyer that this thing was just reincarnated few days ago
    2 points
  35. That's alright, they didn't have Mixels.
    2 points
  36. I sold all of mine so I didn't have to apply them either ;-)
    2 points
  37. My daughter and I have been working on these for the last couple of weeks. All done with them, now to hang them in her room. All 5 Elves dragons and the Pegasus sleigh.
    2 points
  38. 2 points
  39. Funny how many people have been blasted for doing this on a daily basis for years as its not worth the risk or time blah blah blah but now its ok?
    2 points
×
×
  • Create New...