Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/18/2016 in all areas
-
12 points
-
Here is a guy on CL wanting to pay $20 for someone to build his Tower Bridge https://raleigh.craigslist.org/tag/5453741859.html Maybe there is an untapped market for lego subcontractors9 points
-
All done . Need a cigarette and I don't even smoke. build was the most challenging that I have encountered . Parts 1 & 2 get things going with things getting really interesting in parts 3 ( gear box/back ) and definitely 4 (arm) and 5 (front) . Part 6 is a breeze and a good cool down . It does get frustrating at some points as is the case with most advanced Technic sets . There always seems to be the inevitable mess up where a gear doesn't click into place or something is not aligned correctly. Atleast for me anyways. The end product is amazing as display piece and everything works as advertised. Front of the truck is sure to start a conversation or two. Highlight being watching the arm come to life and maneuvering it . Drawbacks : -I would have gladly paid a little extra to have a small engine added - power function doesn't include the tires . 9/108 points
-
7 points
-
I feel you may not know how this whole LEGO investing thing we do here works...........if I were you I would spend a few weeks reading this forum and then start posting. Just a friendly suggestion.6 points
-
6 points
-
picked up the 1960s Batcave set - just built the bat mobile, pretty incredible so far....5 points
-
I just wanted to thank Alpine and all the other mods for making this an amazing forum. Your work is not unnoticed, and it IS appreciated. Also to the newbs, its' amazing how many questions you might have already exist as a forum topic or a great blog. Be sure to SEARCH FIRST, then ask your questions. You'll be amazed and get much better answers in existing topics when the questions were first asked then if someone has to remember the points and counterpoints and summarize them. Thanks to everyone for making this a great place.5 points
-
Mytoys.de: -20% off Lego City till 19.02.02016. Disocunt is being automatically applied during checkout process (Dont forget to check the 2E discount box at the end). 15% NewCustomer Coupon does not stack with any of these. And for all the Payback Users there's still the 10x Points Coupon. Example: 60097 City Square 139,99E - 20% - 2E = 112,94E (-10% in PaybackPoints) = 101,65E Not the best deal ever but maybe you'll find some other stuff out there P.s.: Minimun buy is 35E to get the discount.4 points
-
There's quite a bit of debate in the Poe's Xwing topic in the Star Wars forum topic. Some of the reasons to think there's smoke (and thus fire): 1) there was some sort of windshield issue early on (September 2015) that made it hard to find 2) there were continued shortages throughout it's life so far. 3) It is out of stock at most online retailers and only available for backorder at Lego right now while the rest of the wave 1 is available just about everywhere. 4) it is out of stock in Retail locations in MANY (not all) parts of the US currently. If you check store trackers for Walmart & Target it's nowhere to be found in many places i've travelled like North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, and others. 5) The new wave of 2016 summer sets has a new x-wing with Poe Some reasons to think there is no fire, just smoke. 1) It still has shelf stickers in stores even though it's sold out, just like Jurassic did. They don't reserve shelf space for product that isn't going to arrive. Shelf space is golden and good stores don't waste it. 2) You CAN still back order it at lego.com 3) it's only been out for 5 months so far. Even if it retired when the new sets come out, would it really last for LESS than a calendar year? Lots of folks took some of the signs above as reasons that Jurassic Park was gone, but it is clearly back in full force (minus one store exclusive set. Jurassic Park clearly isn't Star Wars, but could Poe's Xwing be a set that retires sooner than the rest of the wave? Who knows. I think its' an outstanding set, but perhaps only worth stockpiling at a discount. I wouldn't want to be caught without my target quantity, so place your bets accordingly.4 points
-
3 points
-
Can't help. I've got to clean up DD. In all seriousness, what you are describing is stock manipulation and it's something we frown upon heavily here at Brickpicker. If you'd like to discuss the ethics of buying like that, we have an ethics thread to discuss these things. Will link to it later.3 points
-
Sounds like a clear case of extortion. I would fight it with eBay. They need to offer some proof if they want to file a case... at least make them work for it!3 points
-
Not to derail further off-topic, but can someone point me in the direction of a thread explaining why pricing errors like this occur on Amazon? Does it have something to do with automatic pricing algorithms used by vendors? If Bob Barker taught me anything, it's that buying something for one dollar is ethical as long as it's close to the actual retail price--without going over.3 points
-
Here we go again. I hope by now the mods have a stored procedure to move chunks of the DD thread to the Ethics thread.3 points
-
3 points
-
FWIW. My approach to AWD would be for one purpose. To build. Because you are dealing with returns you need to treat them as just that. You don't know what the previous buyer did. So by buying to build you will have no problems cutting the seals (if they are intact) and verifying the contents. So by taking this approach there is no risk at all with AWD.3 points
-
Kmart Haul from the new releases and a plethora of SYW coupons: Started off with about $20 in SYW points - Order #1 total $53.35 - Airport Battle #76051 Order #2 total $43.45 - Crossbones' Hazard Heist #76050, Iron Man Vs. Loki #10721, & Black Panther Pursuit #76047 Order #3 total $48.86 - Droid Escape #75136 & Carbon-Freezing #75137 Order #4 total $54.31 - Imperial Shuttle Tydirium #75094 Still have around $24.00 in SYW left and earned a total combined discount of around 37% on the 4 orders. Thanks Kmart!3 points
-
I don't honestly have doubts that it will appreciate in value. Only because of the UCS label, completionists will want to own it. I see it around $350-$400 for a while. That's where laggers tend to hover anyways, not too much above MSRP, but enough for some people to make a little profit of. Will it be a quick burner? I highly doubt that IMO, especially in it's EOL stages. On to the last sentence: ROTLMFAO at finding this for 50% off. That will be pretty damn hard to near impossible if this stays an exclusive. And because of the UCS label, I highly doubt there will ever be discounts on it. Short of this turning out like the B-wing, which let's face it, the way Lego is going right now, this will be a decent seller, and have no justification for a discount to move on to another set. I honestly feel you on this, even though I don't play with my sets. But, even I have beef with this set. At least with the EV and Sandcrawler, you get a great cohesive set, that looks good just sitting there on a desk, and actual play value. With this Hoth set, you get nothing. 2 baddies, hardly allows for much play anything without having to add on other sets. This defeats the entire purpose of what I believe to be a good decent set. When you say you need to add on tons of stuff to make it better, than it just further goes to show what a terrible job they did in releasing this set. I know everyone has their own opinion and I respect yours, but they honestly could've done better meshing the two. IMO, (some won't like it,) but I think in order to do this a true UCS Assault on Hoth, they should've made it a $400, add an AT-AT, AT-ST, get rid of all of superfluous crap, and just focus on the base and main shield generator. I really feel if something like this was done, then you could honestly really recreate the assault without having to do too much, and I think it would be worthy of the UCS tag at that point.3 points
-
3 points
-
3 points
-
Congratulations! You just UCS-Assault-on-Hoth'ed all contents of this thread into one large reply.3 points
-
Is it really that good? is the question I intend to answer from my point of view in this blog. Lego set 75060 depicting Slave I in UCS style has been jubilated on every Lego related forum, in every review. So, conscious of these reviews and opinions, is the build still going to be great? Can we believe the hype? If you're like me, you already know my answer because the first thing you did when clicking on this blog is scroll down to read my conclusion. For those who are not like me and want to read the whole article, I tried to write down my thoughts and feelings (immediately) after each step of the build. I won't tell all surprises and advanced building methods I encountered, as that would ruin the fun for you. This way I had to actively think about the build along the way. Some aspects of this blog will transcend the nature of a review, such as using an alternative to the set's stickers and my thoughts on future demand of this Lego set and its parts. REVIEW: SET DETAILSLego set: 75060Name: Slave ITheme: Star WarsParts: 1996Price: $199.99 Looking at the value of this set, at first glance it feels better priced than the 75095 Tie Fighter, a comparable Ultimate Collector Series model. But let's have a closer look, first at the pricing in the Netherlands. Here the Tie Fighter is priced €229.99 while the Slave I's MSRP is €199.99. While the Tie Fighter is 30 euros more expensive, it has 311 parts less than the Slave I. So unless you're a great Tie Fighter fan, if you live in the Netherlands and had to choose between these two UCS's, from a cost per piece-perspective the choice is easy: Slave I. But you shouldn't just look at piece count, other factors are also important (e.g. the Tie Fighter has lots of large plates). In the US, both UCS sets cost $199.99. The cost per piece for the Slave I is $0.10. With quite a few large and special pieces (which will be discussed later), this price is in principle good for a licensed set. And don't forget that there are 4 minifigures in this set. BOX CONTENTS There are 13 build sections, some consisting of more than one bag. Within the larger bags you'll find smaller bags containing small parts. The beautiful canopy and black info plate do not come bagged. Instruction manual plus sticker sheet: The instruction book contains some nice info on the 'real' ship, its design, its history and the Lego design. In that it resembles the booklets the Lego Architecture fans have gotten used to. There's even an interview with designer Hans Burkhard Schlömer about developing the model. Due to copyright reasons (and to give you a taste for more) I'll only show you a glimpse. THE BUILD STICKER SHEET The first thing you'll have to decide is what to do with the stickers (no less than 23! Didn't expect they were so many just by looking at the sheet). You have at least four options: Don't use the stickers. Apply them. Your set will look great but it will depreciate. If you want to sell it in the future, it's better to sell it with an intact sticker sheet. Furthermore, because of the lack of quality of these modern paper-stickers Lego produces, before too long the stickers will peel and/or crumble. This process cannot be undone, the stickers cannot be restored. Buy an original sticker sheet, e.g. on Bricklink. I usually do this when building larger / rarer sets, but 75060 sticker sheets are too expensive (for my taste) already. In Europe I can find a few for 12 euros a piece + shipping. In the US there's a Bricklinker who offers them for 10 bucks + shipping. Buy a reproduction sheet, keep the original. There are specialized companies who make these sheets in rather good quality. Make sure you have the reproduction sheet at home when starting the build. Reproduce the stickers yourself. I chose 5. Just copy the sticker sheet on a A4 or letter format white sticker sheet. You can buy those in office stores. After printing, you can 'laminate' the newly made sheet by applying a transparent glossy plastic sticky sheet. Forgot that step myself, unfortunately, so on the pics you'll see matte stickers. 'Laminating' serves to give the same glossy shine as the original stickers, as well as to protect the pigments. Anyway, after (optional) 'laminating' you can simply cut out the stickers using a ruler, sharp knife and hard cutting base (cutting mat or board). For curved cuts, try to use a cup as template. The result: Not perfect, but to me it's a good alternative to using the valuable sticker sheet. Here is the result (left: Original sticker sheet, right: The plate with reproduction sticker attached): Bag 1: Opening bag 1 I thought to myself "will it be really that good?" Everyone seems to be full of praise as to building this set. Is everyone simply repeating what others say? Let's find out if the build is as good as the end result looks. The start (Slave I's base) doesn’t contain too many surprises. I take note that several 2-wide-plates only rest on 1-wide plates or bricks. The result isn’t flimsy though. On the following pictures you'll see the build status after each step, plus the bags used, plus spare parts, plus a minifig completely unnecessarily posing in a completely random manner. I included that for those who are to any extent sensitive to this obscure playfulness used in all Lego reviews. Bag 2: Building the contents of (small) bag #2 brings a smile to my face. Diagonally extended… extended still… verticality brought horizontal, horizontality connected sideways... this is what advanced Lego building is all about! The second half of this sub-build is symmetrical to the first half, so I let my girlfriend have a go… she was equally amused. Bag 3: This nicely shows the techniques to get the smooth sloped red base in its designated form. The build stays enjoyable. Bag 4: This deals with the ‘top’ or ‘back’ side of the base. Great ‘ah!’-moment here. Some stickers have to be applied in this step. Bags 5: Starting these, the nature of the build changes dramatically. All you’ll see is technic bricks, pins, connectors, linkages, plates etc.: Building the connection section between aft and for bases. As with a good film script, the build process never loses pace, never gets boring. Some interesting building techniques are demonstrated while the underside is polished and finalized. Bag 6: Continuing the Lego Technic exercise, bag 6 introduces us to (two-faced) Han Solo (including a beautifully moulded carbonite block). Work is started on the interior construction, ending with another ‘aha’-moment. Lovely. And.. this thing is getting heavy. Bags 7: This is really 4 plastic bags and 1 small thick paper box. I recommend using a sharp knife to cut the tapes of the box if you're super-tidy and want to keep it in good shape. This step #7 brings us a very detailed Boba Fett-figure as well as both wings. If Lego wanted to make a set like this even better than it is now, one thing to mind would be the build order. Building two symmetrical wings in a row makes for a slightly repetitive experience. Why not begin the build (bag 1) with one wing and build the other (bag 7) now? Less logical but more fun. Anyway, the wings add to the surface of this vehicle. It's starting to look massive. To continue the fanboy-speech, the gravitation-driven automatic wing repositioning is very nicely done. Not sure what all the spare parts are for though (4x part 17-01, not used in the build). Boba Fett: Bag 13: For me now was the time to build the stand. Probably the least exciting part of set 75060, I like to save the best part till the end. Building the stand wasn't all too bad I guess... plus you get a storm trooper in this bag (probably as a surprise for those builders who thought they only had the stand to put together). Bag 8: To summarize this part of the build: stacking up. The 'inner walls' are constructed here. Meanwhile the nicely detailed cockpit is added. Ok I'll admit, to me this build can't go wrong anymore; I'm just loving every minute of it. Even this simple 'stacking up' has its charm, as I'm constantly thinking what all the side studs are going to be used for. Bag 9: Simply great... what can I say... you just have to build this thing yourself. My favorite part of the build so far. And what a great way to use part 4278756 (gear shifter)... at one point the designer is just showing off: But the result is lovely: Bags 10: The 'tail' structure and the top (including canopy) of Slave I are built together. The full size is now shown, quite impressive. Bag 11: Port side plating is made. These are three larger subassemblies which come together at the very end. Again, a very interesting and enjoyable build. Suddenly I realize I'm in the middle of having the best Lego build experience ever. Or not exactly in the middle... only one bag to go... unfortunately! The model is becoming very heavy by the way (1,68 kg now). Bag 12: Starboard side plating. As both sides are not symmetrical, the fractions of repetitiveness aren't at all annoying. The build is rounded off by the weaponry in Slave 1's tail. OPINION THE BUILD This experience has been a treat. A great looking Star Wars ship model has been converted into a highly realistic, fun to build, awe-inspiring Lego sculpture. If this wasn't the best build I ever experienced (including several modulars and the astounding Technic Mercedes-Benz Arocs) it is certainly in my top 3. While in my opinion this set does not have any real flaws (except perhaps the weakly manufactured sticker sheet), if the build order was amended and if there were less stickers to attend to, that would make it even better. To optimize your build experience I recommend starting with bags 11 and 13, then moving to bag 1 and from there keep to the designated build order. THE MODEL As everyone and their droid have already made clear, this model is a stunner. Have a look: Although this is not really a playset (try playing with it for 5 minutes without breaking off something), the Slave I has some nice play-like features. The side guns are retractable, the 'cargo door' can be opened and Han Solo can be attached on its inside. If you accidentally lose grip and Han is dropped inside, you don't have to take the ship apart or shake it. There's a hidden hatch on the bottom; if you open it Han is released. Furthermore, the wings are gravitationally actuated. If built with care, the wing movements are very smooth. The tail guns are positionable, as are the wing flaps. The cockpit canopy can be detached rather easily and Boba Fett's cockpit seat can be turned to either horizontal (land mode) or vertical (flight mode) position. Many people have already pointed out that this set is huge. It's always a bit difficult to assess a model's size from pictures alone. To give you an impression I photographed Slave I together with a train, a classic Lego city truck and Architecture's Lincoln Memorial. The latter can easily be shoved underneath the ship if put on the stand. Both train and truck are tiny in comparison to Slave I. The minifigures are nicely done. Han (the only minifigure with two face prints) comes with his sleeping bag; as said Boba Fett is well detailed and there's a Bespin Guard as well as a Stormtrooper. Boba and the guard are unique to this set. Boba's two guns can be stored on clips inside the cockpit. The stand is made in such way that the ship can be showcased either seen from the front or from the side (this is done by simply repositioning two 2x1 plates). I prefer the side view because that way the UCS information tile is better visible. Perhaps the front view is more impressive though. PARTS VALUE As discussed in the introduction I think this set has a good parts / price ratio. The current Bricklink part out value (incl. box and instructions) is $498.54 and there is little hope this number will ever go down. There are several special / rare parts in the set, such as: UNIQUE PARTS 4 dark green round corner bricks #95118. 6 dark red round corner bricks #95188. 2 dark red other round corner bricks #87559. 2 dark red yet other round corner bricks #58846. 1 sand green wedge 3x4x3/4 triple curved #93604. 2 sand green wedge plates 4x6 cut corners #32059. 1 transparent canopy #16477. The sticker set #75060stk01. RARE PARTS 4 dark green other round corner bricks #87559 (1 other set). 2 dark red wedge corner slopes #43708 (1 other set). 4 dark red 3x3x1 slopes #4161 (2 other sets). 2 dark red 10x1x1 slopes #85970 (2 other sets). 1 light bluish grey 10x10 inverted dish #50990b (2 other sets). 2 dark red 4x2x1 slopes #30363 (3 other sets). 1 carbonite box #87561pb01 (3 other sets). 15 sand green curved slopes without studs #15068 (3 other sets). 1 dark red 8x3x2 wedge open left #43708 (4 other sets). 1 dark red 8x3x2 wedge open right #41749 (4 other sets). 6 light bluish grey round corner plates #30565 (4 other sets). 4 yellow liftarm pieces #60484 (4 other sets). 2 dark red round corner plates #30565 (5 other sets). 2 dark bluish grey round corner bricks #88293 (5 other sets). 18 dark red 4x1x1 slopes #60477 (5 other sets). 2 light bluish grey mudguards #62361 (5 other sets). Probably I forgot a few. Also don't forget about what I mentioned about the minifigures. So if you are a collector and if you wanted to gather this set roaming the vaults of Bricklink in a few years from now I'd have to wish you luck. There are many unique and rare pieces around this set. Unless Lego will reuse these pieces in other sets (I don't see an extensive market for the enormous and very specific canopy part, to name an example) I think the parts value of this set will only go up. If you want this ship, buy it while it hasn't been retired. DESIRABILITY To me it is beyond any doubt that this set will be cherished by Lego collectors who own it, longed for by those who don't. Chances of a remake are thin I think. Would any designer dare to tackle remaking / improving a set this good? And even if it was to be remade, why not first do an updated Tie Interceptor (7181), Rebel Blockade Runner (10019), Naboo Starfighter (10026), Snowspeeder (10129), Imperial Star Destroyer (10030), Y-Wing (10134), Death Star II (10143), AT-ST (10174), Advanced Tie Fighter (10175), AT-AT (10178), Millennium Falcon (10179), Dropship / AT-OT (10195), Imperial Shuttle (10212), Obi-Wan's Starfighter (10215), Super Star Destroyer (10221) or B-Wing (10227)? My point is, so many UCS vehicles have been made during the last 15 years and Slave I was ignored until now; I don't see a swift remake coming. The only UCS-remake thus far is the X-Wing and it took Lego 13 years before it was executed. What are the chances of Lego wanting to remake an already almost perfectly modeled Slave I in 2028? When it will retire I have no idea. Could be swiftly (on Lego Shop at Home I saw quite a few 'out of stock' / 'available' changes the last couple of weeks) or it could take some time. Rumors about Slave I featuring in the upcoming Star Wars Rogue One movie (first anthology, 2016) and even a full Star Wars movie dedicated to Boba Fett (second anthology, presumably coming out 2018) may be reason for The Lego Group to keep this set around longer. Let's just say that If I were in charge of Lego I'd find it hard to retire a set this great and relevant to a feature film even if that film will be coming out in two years from now. I see two things possibly standing in the way of late (e.g. 2018) retirement: 1) license agreement ending; and/or 2) Boba Fett movie not being effectuated. According to some sources Disney has experienced difficulties in assigning a heroic role for the villain-like character Boba Fett actually is. In case set 75060 is retired before the Boba Fett movie comes out and if that movie will actually come out, these sets are bound to become even more desirable than they already will be otherwise. FINAL THOUGHTS Welcome, fast-scrolling reader, to this review! To give you the swift answer: yes the build is definitely that good. And the model looks great. Asymmetry makes it look more interesting. The finished Slave I is huge. And the box art is beautiful as well. The instructions contain interesting info and history sections. After its retirement this set will most probably become highly sought-after and its price will rise. In all, designer Hans Burkhard Schlömer did such a wonderful job that the creation of his disappointing newest model (UCS Hoth Base) is easily forgiven. Clearly as a designer you'll have to do what you can within the company's instructions and fortunately it seems that for the Slave I project Mr Burkhard Schlömer had carte blanche. I'll keep my conclusion simple. This set is a must-have for any Lego fan and any Star Wars fan. Get it while you can! Find it here on Amazon.2 points
-
“Lego Star Wars: The Freemaker Adventures" series coming to Disney XD. http://variety.com/2016/tv/news/lego-star-wars-freemaker-adventures-series-disney- New Trailer2 points
-
Whoa! A new question SYW is the acronym for the Shop Your Way rewards program that includes surprise points (cash off of purchase), bonus points (for example $10 in points on a $30 purchase), and cash discounts (5% off of a toy, $10 off of a $50 order). Generally, they do not work on items labelled as 'Hot Buy' but most Lego sets are not tagged as Hot Buy for the first couple of weeks of availability. It is a little more complicated for accounting, and sometimes you receive pancakes or drapes, but you can manufacture some really good deals there without having to go into a Kmart.2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
No. If you don't have them in your area that makes sense. I see them on the racks all the time and they weren't on sale, so I was just curious why he purchased so many.2 points
-
2 points
-
X1 75908 Ferrari 458 Italia GT2 (to complete my Speed Champions wave 1 collection) and x1 75872 Audi R18 to start my Speed Champions wave 2 collection!2 points
-
In general I agree but if you know what the contents of the set are supposed to be, it can make sense to buy for resale. I bought a Sea Cow in January for $205 on AWD, verified the contents were complete and flipped it two weeks later for $380. Obviously this isn't the norm and that particular sale was just a matter of the timing being right, but the point is there are times when buying from AWD for resale can work, again, assuming you know what the bag count, minifigs, rare parts, ect are supposed to be. IMO, pros to buying on AWD for resale: 1) Easy way to save 18% on exclusives 2) You know the box is going to be damaged and so will your future customer. This means no dealing with box snobs and most likely no returns due to box damage during shipping. 3) You personally verified the contents and in most cases likely have pictures of everything. Seems to me to be less of a target for scammers. cons: 1) Save ~18% today, sell for ~18% less tomorrow. The math works fine so in general this isn't a con. However the box will take up the same amount of space in your storage area. So you need more square feet of storage space to invest the same amount of capital. 2) Potential to get open bags or missing pieces as others have stated. Amazon support is great but it's one more thing to deal with. 3) Verifying the set contents takes a bit of time and when selling you'll probably need unique pictures of each damaged item. So a more time invested per set. 4) Mental health, lol. A storage room full of these beat up boxes can start to look depressing When I first started investing I bought a number of sets on AWD for investment because of the savings, however as I started to realize the cons I've now almost completely stopped (Mainly reason #1 and #4). Now I mainly buy builders like you said but occasionally I'll still buy for resale. Certainly if I ran a parts store it would be a no-brainer for getting exclusives.2 points
-
No new progress on the cage itself, but i finally got around to building the Explorer! And i have to say it is gorgeous. Again though this is not my design, it was some kind of custom kit my GF bought for me from Japan i believe. At first i thought they were probably fake pieces, but they look and feel real, either way the car is awesome. It's obviously quite massive and not entirely minifig scale (however Han and co do look pretty cool in there), but i think it just looks so good that i'll include it for now. It almost becomes the centerpiece of the display which i'm ok with. If the T-Rex were bigger (or brickbuilt) he'd be the center of attention, but as it stands the LEGO version of Mr.Rex is a bit on the wimpy side which is no fault of theirs really. If down the road the scale bugs me i'll make smaller cars. I also really like the open window/no window design. This allows the figures to be viewed a bit easier which will be crucial when my minifig parts arrive to make Grant/Ian/Lex/Tim. I did do a couple modifications to try and increase the integrity, added the famous cup to the front dash and added exposed studs to the back seats so the figures stayed seated. The back seat even has a place for Revan to store his lightsaber! (or the goggles/flares from the movie). The car is very fragile, designed to %100 be a display model and not touched, hell it even has issues just rolling on it's wheels (they get caught on pieces when pressure applied. The doors do open and close, but are quite fragile. Lots of illegal building techniques in this model to say the least haha. I think once all the fences are up and the inside paddock raised; the car won't look as big compared to everything else. Raising the paddock is my next goal. I plan to use the old Duplo trick to cut down on hundreds of bricks. Overall though i love this thing no matter what it's used for. As you can see in the last photo i have all 4 foundations ready and awaiting the slope pieces. Each foundation needs about 24 of them, and the Bricklinkers in Canada have very few of these pieces so it's a slow process getting them all. I expect my next update will be a very rainbow-y Duplo mess2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
Very true. I purchased an Emerald Night train 2 years ago from AWH listed as good / used. Was very surprised to find out it was a semi-crushed box with 2 of the 4 tape seals barely holding. I decided to open it and verify the contents just to be saw. everything inside was sealed. Wow my lone sea cow was a $200 AWH deal. The box is totally crushed but inner contents were sealed and complete. Other sets have been the direct opposite. Missing stuff. Boxes ruined. Every now and again, you'll find a gem using AWD.2 points
-
Might be old news to some, but a local WM has many of the new March sets in stock. This location still has all the sets we've seen clearanced in a giant pile doing nothing (literally stacked on top of each other in an end-cap like we all know not to do :P). Nothing marked down yet, they even got a restock of T-Rex Trackers which are now both in the clearance section and on the shelf...2 points
-
2 points
-
Obviously depends on what it costs for you to insure it. It costs me an extra €5 to send registered post which means I'm insured. If I did that on every €50 item, then effectively I'm insuring against a 10% defect rate or on €100 items a 5% defect rate. Obviously I'm not expecting a 10% defect rate so I don't take out insurance, meaning I'm effectively self insuring. The point is to work out the cost, find a risk factor where you think beyond that it's too much risk and then that's the level where you take out the insurance.2 points
-
2 points
-
Some rumors over on brickset that this could be an April promo.2 points
-
This set is an EPIC fail from an investment standpoint. The main market for a UCS set in in which someone who will pay 600-700 for a set is an AFOL with a large amount of disposable income and typically has minimal shelf space in which display sets. This AFOL is very picky as to which UCS or Large Lego sets he/she buys. This set has absolutely ZERO displayability as it is so disjointed it would look like garbage on a shelf. In 3-4 years, an AFOL who came out of the dark ages and missed this set will have 50 other sets they would rather allocate cash to WELL before this one. Various portions of this set will also likely be remade in various smaller set forms 2-3 times in the next 5-6 years, further shooting the value through the floor. EV is super risky to buy and I can barely see that appreciating enough to make a return. Buying this set for investing is just insanity. You might as well just flush money down the toilet on this one. For this to sell for 400 dollars to make it worth your time, it would take Lego burying nearly every set in the Arizona desert to increase the rarity (Atari ET Reference) to make this even remotely worthwhile. Maybe not that bad, but you get my point. This was truly TLG mailing it in. Utter laziness. It has some value if you are a parent looking for a one stop shop, but absolutely ZERO from a resale standpoint. AVOID AT ALL COSTS if you are investing unless you get a 50% or more discount. You have been warned.2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
Couple more parts arrived last night, however i can't really get any further without more of the foundation slope pieces. I guess i stumbled upon a bricklinker that takes a little extra time to get stuff out. However i had enough pieces to make 1 fence! (will need 3-4 more i think). With this 1 fence as my guideline; i was able to confirm that A: i do need to raise the inside of the paddock to be foundation-level, and B: i need to take a level off the fence. Otherwise any dino put behind is sort of dwarfed (as are the trees). So i've put a large order in for some extra green plates and some basic 2x4 bricks to go underneath and raise it up. Still waiting on some 2x4 white tiles to replace the caution 1x4 strips so i can put the "10,000 Volts" decals ontop of them. I wanted to put the fences on smaller plate pieces, however with the fence... posts? so close together it obstructed too much of the view inside. As such i will go with larger plates under the foundation. Each fence should ideally connect with each other with technic connectors to look as seamless as possible. I tested out some ways of connecting each fence at the bottom with hinges, but couldn't get it just right. So i'll likely keep the bottoms a bit loose (at least on the fence pieces that have to curve). Tonight i think i will finally tackle the Explorer. As i said before i don't actually have to design this myself or purchase the pieces as my SO purchased a custom kit for me a few months ago. However i think the scale might be too large for my build (543 pieces or something), if so i will see about building a smaller one. Even though the fences are not %100 movie accurate since i opted to go with black; i think it looks pretty good. I did test out dark grey/light grey and it didn't look as menacing. The black makes it look a bit creepier and imposing. More to come!2 points
-
I have zero hoth sets, so a set like this could appeal to me (and it does a little) but you can't ignore the fundamental flaws with the design/contents/name of the set itself UCS or not. I read a great review of it on another LEGO website and it highlighted some significant flaws in a $250 set and thats where I think the anger and disappointment come into play. Most people accept that a $20, $30, $50 LEGO set will have it's limitations... people don't want a $250 set to have the same limitations. Because LEGO took a vacation and jammed those old sets together, you get things like: - a shield generator with 3 turbines instead of 4 - an assault with two baddies - a wampa cave that although cute doesn't match the lines of the model - a tauntaun feeding station that is where in the movies? - a watch tower that is where in the movies? - a gate with exposed gear mechanisms (yuck) You just can't ignore that no other Star Wars UCS set was this badly executed and this unoriginal.2 points
-
It would be utterly hilarious if inside the box was just the boxed sets that have already been released........I'm hoping for this so we can see people's heads explode!2 points
-
This is the one set that box condition might actually be the most important factor since the contents suck.2 points
-
You guys should know from being on this site that the customer is not always right. The envelope rate is intended for a stack of papers. The machinery that processes envelopes will chew up anything that has a piece of ABS plastic inside it. The only way to safely ship Lego is parcel rate in a bubble mailer or box. Some sellers may be willing to take the risk that your parcel makes it through without getting destroyed. We ship ~1000 orders a month, and we've got a standard process. if you were to ask us to ship via envelope we'd say no.2 points