- Replies 68
- Views 14.6k
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
justafrog 6 posts
-
gregpj 5 posts
-
Kenxxx 5 posts
-
minicoopers11 5 posts
Most Popular Posts
-
It's easy on the buying side to be unaware of postage charges (no, you cannot send a minifigure in a simple first class letter envelope - and if you do, it's going to be crushed by the sorting machine
-
Okay
-
this is why paypal should be used for all bricklink purchases. i know it isn't "ebay or amazon" but paypal does offer excellent protection for a website not associated with bric
Featured Replies
Recently Browsing 0
- No registered users viewing this page.
I've been doing some "window shopping" around bricklink pricing out some older retired sets I might want to add to my collection. I noticed that quite a few sellers have disclaimers stating things like"
-item is not my responsibility once it's dropped off at the post office
-not responsible if item is damaged/lost in mail
-buyer is responsible for submitting usps insurance claim if item is damaged
This seem odd to me. I know bricklink is not ebay, but this stuff would never fly on ebay. I figured the general consensus is that the seller is responsible for getting the purchased item to the buyer in the condition it was described in. That's how I operate whenever I sell something online. If an item is damaged, I'll refund right away and then work with the post office to get reimbursed.
I've also noticed that some of these sellers retaliate against not as described cases by leaving negative feedback for the buyer. I'm sure there are bad buyers out there, but it seems like a broken system if you can be neg'ed just because you want a refund due to an item being lost in the mail.
If I buy something from a store with these disclaimers, would this affect any protections I would get if I had to file a not as described claim with paypal?