THE BRICKPICKER LEGO SET REVIEW/BLOG ARTICLE CONTEST IS HERE!!!

Jeff and I are proud to announce this contest for all registered BrickPicker members. It will be based on LEGO set reviews, Evalution Corner and Blog articles. We will judge the winners on several aspects, such as overall quantity, content and quality. We will take into consideration the quantity of reviews and articles you submit and the content and quality of those reviews/articles/blogs. Just because you pump out more reviews than other members, if your content and quality are subpar or very average, we can elect someone else the winner.

The basic BrickPicker Set Review will be accepted at 1000 characters. No less. Unlike the earlier Set Review version, you will be required to submit content for each of the 10 basic categories below:

First Impression(WOW Factor) & Introduction

An introduction and first impression of the LEGO set. Does the LEGO set "WOW" you? Is it or will it be an "iconic" LEGO set? When you see this set, you say to yourself, "I just have to have one!?

Unique Parts/Minifigures

Does the LEGO set have rare or unique minifigures? Are there rare parts/colors in the set? Does the set have a large amount of minifigures or parts that make it more desirable?

Playability/Build Experience

Does the set have elements that make it an extremely "fun" set to play with or to build, thus affecting it's popularity and future viability as an investment?

Value for money(new)

Is the set a bargain? Does the set give you a "bang for your buck" when considering piece to price ratio or is the price of the set extremely high priced for the amount of pieces included? This rating also plays into LEGO collectors/investors who like to "part out" LEGO sets to make money...Could the set be used to "part out for a profit"?

Theme Popularity

Is the LEGO set from a popular LEGO theme that sells well in the primary retail LEGO market and will most likely translate to positive growth in the secondary LEGO market?

Exclusivity

Is the set an "exclusive" set and is marked accordingly so? Is the set limited in production in any way? Is the set from a Toy Fair or Comic Con or other LEGO trade show that has limited production runs?

Packaging

Does the set have unique packaging that makes it stand out from the typical LEGO set? Does the set have special markings on the box that differentiate it from other LEGO sets?

Growth Potential

What is the potential growth of this set in the secondary LEGO market? Will this set appreciate or depreciate after being retired(EOL)?

Display Attributes

Does this set when built display well? Is it a topic of conversation when built and displayed in a office or den? Does it make for an impressive or unique set when compared with other LEGO set

Final Analysis & Conclusion

Your overall final impression of the set, taking into consideration all the above factors. A final synopsis or conclusion about the LEGO set. The numerical rating is for the entire set, with a 10 being the ?perfect? LEGO set, a 5-6 being about average and a 1 being the bottom of the barrel.

Each category can range from a sentence to several paragraphs if necessary. The combined total for all the category content needs to be 1000 characters to be accepted. You will be asked to leave a numerical 1 to 10 rank for each category as well, with 4,5 and 6 being considered "average" LEGO set rankings. You do not have to own a set to review one, but it would help and this will be noted on each review. Here is a sample of a REVIEW I did for the 10227 UCS B-Wing Starfighter. It is a 5000 character review and I would consider it an above average review. You can do more or less, but proper grammar and spelling is also important.

We will take a snapshot of the current review totals and start from there. A BrickPicker member can look over their personal reviews in our new REVIEW LOG. You will have the ability to resubmit an older review and improve it, with it counting towards the contest. Jeff and I will approve or disapprove each resubmission. What is neat about the new review system is that Jeff and I will be able to award BONUS BRICKPOINTS for above average and special reviews. A basic 1000 character review will be awarded 10 Brickpoints, but we can give up to 500 Brickpoints or more for some in depth and special reviews.

The contest will start immediately and conclude at 11:59 PM(Eastern Time) on July 3rd, 2013. There will be three main prizes:

1ST PLACE: 10228 HAUNTED HOUSE or $200 LEGO GIFT CARD

2ND PLACE: 10232 PALACE CINEMA or $150 LEGO GIFT CARD

3RD PLACE: 9516 JABBA'S PALACE or $100 LEGO GIFT CARD

We will adjust all prizes to the winner's country and situation. Jeff and I understand that some members have to pay more for LEGO sets and we will adapt to each situation. We have the right to change the prizes to equivalent LEGO sets if these become retired or out of stock.

There will also be four $25 LEGO GIFT CARDS given out to those exceptional reviews in which I can convert to content for the EVALUATION CORNER. One person can win them all. Look at my reviews for an example of what I am looking for. You do not have to go through the normal review processor if it is easier to produce a large and quality review and analysis on a word processor like OPEN OFFICE(which I use). If you are doing a "special" review, you can contact me. I can guide you. What I don't want is something I have to rewrite. It needs to be quality content and properly written. I can tweak it and help with data and charts, but the overall written content needs to be very, very good.

Depending on the response, we can throw in some other prizes along the way. Maybe some "Honorable Mentions" or some other prize for some review or content that tickles my fancy. This is a serious competition and Jeff and I want the content of the LEGO set reviews to become a very important part of our site. Unlike the quality reviews on top sites like Brickset or Eurobricks, I want our reviews to focus on aspects of LEGO sets that will affect its "investment" potential and value. You can discuss anything you want, but you should have a serious investment correlation in your reviews when discussing many of the categories. The basic categories are set up like an essay, with an introduction, body & content and then a conclusion. Think of the reviews in proper English class terms and you will do well.

That's about it. Good luck with your reviews and any questions can be posted below. Winners will be announced on July 4th, 2013. Thanks.

Ed Mack

EDIT: JEFF AND I WILL ALSO ACCEPT EVALUATION CORNER/BLOG ARTICLES TOWARDS THE CONTEST AS WELL!!!

Yeeeeaaaah, so maybe I should have done an EC article on my Indy sets =P . I am working on another theme right now, I'll submit it in an EC style instead of ten reviews.

FYI, my job consists of me sitting at a computer for 8-10hrs so I have a note pad up and just jot stuff down every few minutes and on my breaks. I usually wait to submit my reviews until I have four or five done.

I just looked at my brick points and it seems that the character count is basing it off the charts because about 7,000 characters(at least) of each of my Indy sets were characters inside the charts. I didn't think to much of it, but maybe that should be taken into consideration when handing out the points. Feel free to either A. Deduct the appropriate points from my total or B. Issue 0 points per review sent from this point on until I equal out. I definitely don't want to cheat the system here.

Also, for the longest time I wrote reviews for movies on two High Definition forums. I was paid to write reviews and thus I did it as a part time job. Writing Lego reviews is similar, but definitely different. I try to get better with every set I review and I hope others feel I am as well. If you read my first reviews they are weak sauce. If you think I am slacking or need to add better/different content into a review let me know so I can fix it! My formula is basically: 1. My opinion of the set 2. Some basic info about it, possibly how unique it is and include what Lego's description of it was. 3. Compare it to other sets in either the same theme or similar priced items released the same year 4. Figure out from an investment point if this is or was a great investment. After-all this whole site is designed to help investors and I'd like to do my part as well.

Anyways, that was a lot of rambling. Bottom line is if I am turning in half ass reviews PLEASE let me know!

Also, I just noticed my spacing looks weird in some of my reviews. I wonder if that is from copying it from TextEdit to the form. I'll try and work that out, my bad.

Mike, your reviews are great. Other people can do what you do. Looking at your reviews individually, the charts work well. As a whole, they seem redundant, but that's fine because when a members looks at reviews for a set, they are looking at ONE review from you...not TEN. Everyone has their style. If people want to complain, let them. Jeff and I know the effort that went into them.

Also...I'm handing out Brickpoints like they are going out of style. That is a way to get a prize as well. I am not going to nickel and dime people over 10 or 20 points. I have 300 STAR WARS polybags sitting in my storage room and they have to go to someone. With all due respect, Grolim mentioned dollars per hour when writing reviews, then further explained his passion for LEGO bricks. Well I agree with him to a degree and there is some truth to that, but I would like to think it's about having your words being displayed to tens of thousands of LEGO fans across the world, than relating it to a job. Anything dealing with LEGO bricks is not a job in my book...but that's just me.

Whether its 12k or 17k, i personally don't care. I will look at my function for stripping the code. The tables are probably playing a part in it. All i know, its a lot of time and effort put in on his part. And as its been mention many times before, both Ed and I are not really looking at the character count once it gets to a certain point, its more about the quality and what you are doing to explain the set to other people as an investment or collection piece.

Yeah, I don't care at all either, just tryin to help answer Blackjack's query, hence the /shrug. I think Mike's reviews are great as well and I've been trying to read them all Especially the Indiana Jones ones which is a theme I've missed out on personally.

With all due respect, Grolim mentioned dollars per hour when writing reviews, then further explained his passion for LEGO bricks. Well I agree with him to a degree and there is some truth to that, but I would like to think it's about having your words being displayed to tens of thousands of LEGO fans across the world, than relating it to a job. Anything dealing with LEGO bricks is not a job in my book...but that's just me.

Totally agree man. It's not a job at all. It is great being able to share insights with so many other like minded people. lovin it.

Completely true about the charts taking a lot of time. They are actually the only part I dread when writing my reviews, but I find them necessary at some points. I can't imagine how long it takes to do one of those large ones or more than one like Mike has in his reviews, but I know it is probably a lot and for that alone, he deserves credit.

Yeeeeaaaah, so maybe I should have done an EC article on my Indy sets =P . I am working on another theme right now, I'll submit it in an EC style instead of ten reviews.

FYI, my job consists of me sitting at a computer for 8-10hrs so I have a note pad up and just jot stuff down every few minutes and on my breaks. I usually wait to submit my reviews until I have four or five done.

I just looked at my brick points and it seems that the character count is basing it off the charts because about 7,000 characters(at least) of each of my Indy sets were characters inside the charts. I didn't think to much of it, but maybe that should be taken into consideration when handing out the points. Feel free to either A. Deduct the appropriate points from my total or B. Issue 0 points per review sent from this point on until I equal out. I definitely don't want to cheat the system here.

Also, for the longest time I wrote reviews for movies on two High Definition forums. I was paid to write reviews and thus I did it as a part time job. Writing Lego reviews is similar, but definitely different. I try to get better with every set I review and I hope others feel I am as well. If you read my first reviews they are weak sauce. If you think I am slacking or need to add better/different content into a review let me know so I can fix it! My formula is basically: 1. My opinion of the set 2. Some basic info about it, possibly how unique it is and include what Lego's description of it was. 3. Compare it to other sets in either the same theme or similar priced items released the same year 4. Figure out from an investment point if this is or was a great investment. After-all this whole site is designed to help investors and I'd like to do my part as well.

Anyways, that was a lot of rambling. Bottom line is if I am turning in half ass reviews PLEASE let me know!

Also, I just noticed my spacing looks weird in some of my reviews. I wonder if that is from copying it from TextEdit to the form. I'll try and work that out, my bad.

Sorry for putting you on the spot. Great job with the Brickpoints! I'm sure that at the rate you're going, you'll be at the top of the leaderboard in a couple weeks or less! :P

Sorry again for the controversy, I was just wondering what part the charts played, and if I would need to start implementing them to be successful. My questions have been answered. :)

Many people have been asking about including regular Brickvesting Blog articles towards the contest. Jeff and I talked and agreed that WE WILL ACCEPT BLOG ARTICLES, as well as SET REVIEWS and EVALUATION CORNER articles towards the contest.

Basically, any LEGO based, quality written content you provide for the BrickPicker site, we will count towards the contest:

1. LEGO SET REVIEWS

2. EVALUATION CORNER ARTICLES

3. BRICKVESTING BLOG ARTICLES

The SET REVIEWS should meet the requirements posted above. The EVALUATION & BLOG ARTICLES should be well written, with proper spelling and grammar, a minimum of 3 or 4 pages in length. Take a look at current examples to see what we want. I have received four excellent articles the last two days, so the bar is set high. PM Jeff or I with any ideas...

You just made my day! :-)

You just made my day! :-)

Yes, all quality content should be counted. Your article was excellent. Members will enjoy it.

I only just noticed the link for Street Speeder in my Blue Roadster review has been fixed. Thank you again, Jeff.

Hey - just wanted to chime in here. My hats off to you guys for coming up with such a fun and creative way to drive content on the site. I enjoy writing reviews anyway, so having the chance to "compete" while doing it is awesome. The prize lineup is killer btw. Also, if you guys have any constructive feedback on my reviews feel free to offer it. Cheers to all and let the review battle rage on RAWWWR!!!

Hey - just wanted to chime in here. My hats off to you guys for coming up with such a fun and creative way to drive content on the site. I enjoy writing reviews anyway, so having the chance to "compete" while doing it is awesome. The prize lineup is killer btw. Also, if you guys have any constructive feedback on my reviews feel free to offer it.

Cheers to all and let the review battle rage on RAWWWR!!!

Thanks...Don't forget that I added a BrickPicker Member's Choice award for non-winners. It will be like a $100 set and the TOP 13 members who entered the contest and didn't win a main prize will have an opportunity to win if the community votes for their reviews. I will run a poll and those 13 members will go head to head. It should be fun.

Thanks...Don't forget that I added a BrickPicker Member's Choice award for non-winners. It will be like a $100 set and the TOP 13 members who entered the contest and didn't win a main prize will have an opportunity to win if the community votes for their reviews. I will run a poll and those 13 members will go head to head. It should be fun.

When you say head to head, do you mean that after the contest is finished, these 13 members have to do more reviews against each other?

It may be that I'm having a blonde moment but the contest is going on right now right? I was a bit thrown off by the wording if somehow you meant it was a 1 day thing or not o_o... So it has started right now right?

It may be that I'm having a blonde moment but the contest is going on right now right?

I was a bit thrown off by the wording if somehow you meant it was a 1 day thing or not o_o...

So it has started right now right?

Yes, and will last until July 3rd.

Thanks...Don't forget that I added a BrickPicker Member's Choice award for non-winners. It will be like a $100 set and the TOP 13 members who entered the contest and didn't win a main prize will have an opportunity to win if the community votes for their reviews. I will run a poll and those 13 members will go head to head. It should be fun.

When you say head to head, do you mean that after the contest is finished, these 13 members have to do more reviews against each other?

No, we will present the work of the remaining TOP 13 Reviewers to the BrickPicker community and everyone will get to vote on it. The original 3 winners will get their prizes and not be involved in this competition. It's like a another 3rd place prize. Maybe we will give away a B-Wing if we ever get them.

I just wanted to give members a quick update on articles that have been submitted to us for the contest. They are all excellent and well done. All are at least 5 pages(# 12 font, New Times Roman). The will be released in no particular order. It takes some time for Jeff and I to convert them to an article for the site, so please be patient, but all will be released before the contest is over....

Veegs: Creator House Evaluation Corner(EC) article

Quacs: Legends of Chima EC article

Strytlr: Parting Out Blog article

Mikeur86: Avengers EC article

Fcbarcelona101: LOTR EC article

Brianl3: Pick a Brick Blog article

adewar: Winter Village EC article

Fcbarcelona101: Architecture EC article

One other note...It is possible to take your personal reviews and use that information in a larger EC article. If you do this, it just can't be a copy and paste job. There has to be some new and fresh ideas mixed in as well. Thanks.

Those are sweet sounding articles! I particularly looking forward to the Creator House, Parting Out, and Pick a Brick ones. The Architecture article peaks my interest too. I like to see a fair assessment for the line and Fcbarcelona101 does write some good reviews!

Veegs: Creator House Evaluation Corner(EC) article

Quacs: Legends of Chima EC article

Strytlr: Parting Out Blog article

Mikeur86: Avengers EC article

Fcbarcelona101: LOTR EC article

Brianl3: Pick a Brick Blog article

adewar: Winter Village EC article

Fcbarcelona101: Architecture EC article

All of these sound awesome! Looking forward to the Parting Out and Pick a Brick. Also am looking forward to the LOTR and Avengers one because I haven't invested in them yet. Veegs' sounds really good too, but I am biased because I really like his last one on the Friends theme. That was pretty good!

Those are sweet sounding articles! I particularly looking forward to the Creator House, Parting Out, and Pick a Brick ones. The Architecture article peaks my interest too. I like to see a fair assessment for the line and Fcbarcelona101 does write some good reviews!

That one I just finished today. I got to tell you it was particularly difficult since there are not really enough retired sets so far, but I hope you find it interesting!

Thanks for the compliments ;)

That one I just finished today. I got to tell you it was particularly difficult since there are not really enough retired sets so far, but I hope you find it interesting!

Thanks for the compliments

No problem. I may even end up buying a few after reading it when posted! :-)

I just wanted to give members a quick update on articles that have been submitted to us for the contest. They are all excellent and well done. All are at least 5 pages(# 12 font, New Times Roman). The will be released in no particular order. It takes some time for Jeff and I to convert them to an article for the site, so please be patient, but all will be released before the contest is over....

Veegs: Creator House Evaluation Corner(EC) article

Quacs: Legends of Chima EC article

Strytlr: Parting Out Blog article

Mikeur86: Avengers EC article

Fcbarcelona101: LOTR EC article

Brianl3: Pick a Brick Blog article

adewar: Winter Village EC article

Fcbarcelona101: Architecture EC article

TheOrcKing: Planet Set EC article

One other note...It is possible to take your personal reviews and use that information in a larger EC article. If you do this, it just can't be a copy and paste job. There has to be some new and fresh ideas mixed in as well. Thanks.

We have a new contestant!!!:roll:

We have a new contestant!!!:roll:

Finally got the nerve up to put my coin in the machine. It's go time!

"Here comes a new challenger!!"

Very nice review... http://www.brickpicker.com/reviews/set.cfm?set=75005-1

New article by Quacs submitted on LEGO Myths and Truisms....The bar is raised yet again.

Here are what we have so far article wise:

Veegs: Creator House Evaluation Corner(EC) article

Quacs: Legends of Chima EC article

Strytlr: Parting Out Blog article

Mikeur86: Avengers EC article

Fcbarcelona101: LOTR EC article

Brianl3: Pick a Brick Blog article

adewar: Winter Village EC article

Fcbarcelona101: Architecture EC article

TheOrcKing: Planet Set EC article

Quacs: LEGO Truths and Myths Blog article