@CM4Sci is the two product ID numbers normal for new sets?  Perhaps one is a limited first edition.  

19 minutes ago, Pseudoty said:

@CM4Sci is the two product ID numbers normal for new sets?  Perhaps one is a limited first edition.  

That's an interesting thought, didn't the original have a limited run with certificates or something?

It's not my image so I don't know.  As usual, I am just the messenger.  

Edited April 28, 20178 yr by CM4Sci

3 minutes ago, CM4Sci said:

That's an interesting thought, didn't the original have a limited run with certificates or something?

Yes 

Man I thought $500 was pushing it for a set... $800 is nuts!!!

All I can think of is poor kid who gets it as a gift and has to put together thousands of bricks...do kids have this kind of patience, my attention span is 15 minutes....but that's just me maybe lol

If that price point is accurate... i'll be both a very happy and sad person at the same time!

41 minutes ago, Pseudoty said:

@CM4Sci is the two product ID numbers normal for new sets?  Perhaps one is a limited first edition.  

This was my exact thought. Makes sense

38 minutes ago, CM4Sci said:

That's an interesting thought, didn't the original have a limited run with certificates or something?

It's not my image so I don't know.  As usual, I am just the messenger.  

Can you draw the box art

Deleted pic as it was fake

I don't know if this has been shared before.

What get's me is the last line. "WIll Excite Collectors!"

Edited April 28, 20178 yr by siddji
add text

Just now, siddji said:

 

I don't know if this has been shared before.

hahaha

10 minutes ago, LegoEdison said:

Can you draw the box art

Very funny.. 

 

Something tells me tomorrow will be interesting. One job will be lost at least..  

Based on those bullet points, i think the $800 price tag is crap ?

I don't know if this has been shared before.
What get's me is the last line. "WIll Excite Collectors!"

That's the fake photo. That was an April Fools joke posted this year. It is NOT real.

I'll leave that one, but I'm going to delete it if it gets posted again. It has no value.

7 hours ago, CM4Sci said:

 

Fake. Only ebay Noobs price things without 99 cents at the end. Plus it´s a Toshiba and the logo doesn´t line up with the screen. On the other hand, it´s a Toshiba...

14 hours ago, Alpinemaps said:

 

That's the fake photo. That was an April Fools joke posted this year. It is NOT real.

I'll leave that one, but I'm going to delete it if it gets posted again. It has no value.

 

I tried to tell them over on the RS forum but some still don't believe it's fake.

31 minutes ago, MarleyMoose said:

I tried to tell them over on the RS forum but some still don't believe it's fake.

Well, if you believe the screenshot from the Lego store in Texas, we are in for an even more expensive model. Sometimes we have to be careful what we wish for.

Hey this is a personal opinion but I think we really should stop saying the store so the guy isn't fired when LEGO potentially looks into who took the picture.

Hey this is a personal opinion but I think we really should stop saying the store so the guy isn't fired when LEGO potentially looks into who took the picture.

Unfortunately that cat is out of the bag. Not only does the store name show up, but even if it didn't, the guy's posting history on Reddit has him mentioning where in the US he is located.

He's going to have to go on full lockdown, delete his account, etc.

2 hours ago, Alpinemaps said:

Unfortunately that cat is out of the bag. Not only does the store name show up, but even if it didn't, the guy's posting history on Reddit has him mentioning where in the US he is located.

He's going to have to go on full lockdown, delete his account, etc.

Just as we speak officals from the Federal Brick of Investigaion are kicking down his door and taking him away for the leaks.

Just my opinion, but the number 75192 just doesn't impress me.

22 minutes ago, Will 4 said:

Just as we speak officals from the Federal Brick of Investigaion are kicking down his door and taking him away for the leaks.

He could very well be under Brickileaks protection.

6 minutes ago, exciter1 said:

He could very well be under Brickileaks protection.

Assange on Hoth? Maybe he was also responsible for the leaked pic of the UCS Snowden Speeder.

Edited April 28, 20178 yr by Val-E

27 minutes ago, Ed Mack said:

Just my opinion, but the number 75192 just doesn't impress me.

71977 would be much more fitting @Ed Mack

6 minutes ago, Deadfraggle said:

71977 would be much more fitting @Ed Mack

77777 would have been a winner!

6 minutes ago, Deadfraggle said:

71977 would be much more fitting @Ed Mack

They could have used 75179 too, instead of for TLJ....

Just now, Ed Mack said:

77777 would have been a winner!

That´ll be the 50th anniversary remake with a grey hairpiece for Chewie.