Just watched this interesting  and informative video about some of the current and recent Lego licenses and how they had been used by other construction brands in the past. Of special interes, Doctor Who, Yellow Submarine and Scooby Doo.

 

I think the word 'stole' is a bit strong  and could get content owner in trouble.  I'm pretty sure they paid a fortune in licensing fees.

22 minutes ago, Fenix_2k1 said:

I think the word 'stole' is a bit strong  and could get content owner in trouble.  I'm pretty sure they paid a fortune in licensing fees.

Typical clickbait title.

1 hour ago, c_rpg said:

Typical clickbait title.

Its a good video, i like just2good content. 

Regarding his title, yes might be abit clickbait, but seeing some other video titles on youtube its ok.

It could have been "Lego EXPOSED - Manipulating others - prank gone wrong in hood gone sexual etc etc"

3 hours ago, c_rpg said:

Typical clickbait title.

That´s why I toned it down for you good folks.

Someone want to give me the tl;dr version? Anything beyond Scooby, Doctor Who, and Beatles?

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and Spongebob were STOLEN from LEGO!!! /s

"Saying stole is just too easier"...?

Just2Good lost some street cred with this video. He repeatedly stats that TLG "stole the license". As we all know a toy manufacturer must "purchase" license rights to manufacture a toy line based on that license/franchise. LEGO simply won the license.

I actually do not see any issue with multiple toy manufacturers with the same license. Perhaps there's an "exclusive license" for toy manufacturers as well.

Either way. I've seen better from Just2Good.

1 hour ago, Alpinemaps said:

Someone want to give me the tl;dr version? Anything beyond Scooby, Doctor Who, and Beatles?

Marvel, Spiderman, Doctor Who, TMNT, POTC, Simpsons, Angry Birds, Scooby Doo, Beatles, Sonic.  He just says when the other branded sets were released, brief overview of their quality, comparison of quality/set variety, and the current status of the license (if applicable).

I saw J2G getting roasted for his clickbait title on Reddit this morning, too

7 minutes ago, Alpinemaps said:

I saw J2G getting roasted for his clickbait title on Reddit this morning, too

He needed clicks to fund his youtube videos...  His was not any worse than other videos out there.

This was easily why I only subscribed to Jangbricks, no clickbait titles or annoying grunts  

8 hours ago, Darth_Raichu said:

He needed clicks to fund his youtube videos...  His was not any worse than other videos out there.

This was easily why I only subscribed to Jangbricks, no clickbait titles or annoying grunts  

When the youtube fan pages start using clickbate titles to attempt to gather hits, I think it's another sign that things might be getting desperate on their end.....  Back to the bubble thread we go!

He needed clicks to fund his youtube videos...  His was not any worse than other videos out there.
This was easily why I only subscribed to Jangbricks, no clickbait titles or annoying grunts [emoji14] 

I'll give jang a look see. I just unsubscribed from J2G youtube channel..

If you don´t like clickbait then hand in your Lego VIP card and cancel SAH membership! Retiring soon is the worst clickbait there is plus it costs you money.

I believe Just2Good could have easily said "acquired" or, well, anything else really. I won't hold it against him though. Honestly I have seen and/or heard worse. I'm just like "Dude, come on. 'Stole', really?".