Sorry for the length of this, but there really is a common thread to it.
First, realizing that so many states did a first-time way of voting, I'm a bit stumped why we didn't mandate full-on recounts in every state. That would have been a good way to eliminate any "illegitimate vote" garbage. Second, I think it is pretty clear that we need to standardize any federal presidential election (meaning same rules, practices, etc.) This taking weeks to count votes in some states while others are completed within 24 hours is beyond ridiculous.
re: hate speech. I feel like most of us would agree hate-speech is hurtful, inciting violence, etc. But when I have Christian friends being told that talking to their non-Christian friends about Jesus is hate-speech, then I get worried about who defines "hate speech". For a Christian, that is the most loving thing they could possibly do. People may disagree, but is it really "hate speech"?
It behooves us to pay attention to history just how quickly a democratic country can go to pot in the name of progress. The Weimar Republic in Germany collapsed under the weight of restitution payments and hyper-inflation, post-WW1. It gave rise to the National Socialist Worker's Party (anti-big business, anti-wealthy class, anti-capitalism). After coming to power the NAZIs made all other political parties illegal. Then, if you weren't a NAZI party member, you were deemed a threat. I have spoken to German immigrants whose families were sent to work camps (not concentration camps). Hate speech was what the government told you it was.
"Provda" (The ONLY News Agency in the former Soviet Union) means "truth" in the Russian language. It was gov't controlled and told the people what the gov't approved. Everything else was "hate speech".
So who are the arbiters of truth in the USA? I would dare to say it's not the USA government otherwise Trump would not have been endlessly dogged for four years. So from whom are we receiving "truth"? When facebook, twitter, and YouTube are shutting down people on their platform because they have a different political view than their parent company, we can debate if we have an issue and if they are actually publishing or not. Of course, that discussion won't be allowed on their platform.... so people try to set up alternate platforms to discuss. Except, those platforms are being blocked by other privately-owned providers. The end result? Whatever the media giants permit becomes truth. Everything else is deemed "hate speech".
Where then is the dissenting voice? It is effectively cancelled. Although those you oppose today may get cancelled, what is to stop you from getting cancelled tomorrow?
There is a quote from a Lutheran Pastor who lived through WWII - Rev. Martin Niemoller:
First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out - because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me - and there was no one left to speak for me.
Pastor Niemoller served most of WWII in a NAZI concentration camp because he dared to speak out against the mainstream attitude, not just of the government but the press as well.
If we think what happened in Germany can never happen in the USA, then we're not paying attention.
I pray for love, peace, mercy, grace, and forgiveness within our government leaders and our nation as a whole.
On a less serious note. My last complaint tonight is not having enough money for all the rumored Star Wars sets coming out in 2021.