So I am brand new to this forum, but not brand new to the LEGO game. I was in it huge from 2004-2007, Had many UCS xwings, Tie Interceptors, ISD, CTT, Cloud Cities (I thought I did well when I sold my Boba Fett for 98 back then, Oh if I had only known) and then due to space constraints I had to sell of all my stock just because I did not have space. I now own a home, with a large basement, and have since gotten back into it in the last week, starting with the Tumbler. This set alone was enough to pull me out of retirement.
And do you want to know why, despite all the disbelievers on this forum, this will be a grand slam. No doubt about it. And here are my reasons why, and I will try not to rehash some of the points that have been beaten to death.
Who are the people that drive a price up? Like 1000% up? The average collector will drive the price of a collectible to the 200% range, but what makes one take off, like the Taj Mahal or the UCS Millenium Falcon (Shooting myself for not buying that. I got married on 2007, and just did not have the space. I remember the days of it being 400 on LEGO Shop at Home. Sigh). Why is it that some sets can hit the moon and not others? It's the people who the set attracts. While market can dictate a price, the bottom line is only a select few people will pay 5000k for a Falcon or 3000 for the Taj Mahal. For the most part these are the AFOLs that make a salary in which they don't care what they are paying.
I am very blessed in that I make a very nice salary, and I know many other people who do too. I have a friend who bought a 3000 dollar Taj Mahal as an XMas present for her spouse. These are the people that can make a set go to the moon. An executive for a large company is the person who is likely to buy a 5k Falcon for his den, or office to display. The average consumer will not. Everyone complains about AA. Well, I'll tell you why it isn't taking off. No executive wants to display that in their office. I wouldn't. Ask yourself "Would I put this in a fortune 500 CEO's office?" And if the answer is yes, well that is likely to be a winner.
To break into the upper echelon, you have to have not just a market, but have the appeal to the high end 1% market. The market that doesn't care about cost. The market that wants to own it so they can brag and show it off on there shelf and partly to brag they paid "X" dollars for it. My friend just likes to say she paid 3000 for the Taj Mahal. For this market, it's not just about owning it, it's also about how much you paid for it. It's about feeling special by owning it, and showing it off. This set has that potential. My generation (I am 34) is just hitting the sweet spot in life where they are making a great salary, have expendable income and have the space to own the toys that they couldn't afford when they were in the 20's. It is an ICONIC vehicle. When I first watch the Dark Knight and Batman Begins, I couldn't stop thinking how awesome that car was. Some argue it was in only 2 Movies. Well the Falcon was in 3 up until this December. It's in 4 now! The delorean was in 3 Movies! The interest is incredibly high for this item. Will it be a UCS Falcon? No. But will it be better than probably 95% of other lego sets. Definitely.
Legos are a universal appealing item. They transcend borders. Hence why Lego's (UCS Lego's) never depreciate. Some might not go to the moon, but you won't lose money, unlike the stock market. The population of the world only grows, and with population growth, the fans of legos will only grow. Unlike a fad like pokemon, cabbage patch dolls, furby's, lego's have stood the test of time.
Sorry for the long post, but I truly believe this was a no brainer. I bought 25 myself. I predict this to be 650-700 in 3 years. Amazon is already slowly creeping up on the lowest price available. Only one at 259 as of now, and the next is 279. It's only day #1. Ebay sold auctions running 250-280. Even higher in Europe. The future is bright.