I assume this was intended for me? Gonna try and respond to this in point form.
1) I don`t believe I said that HD was a poor investment. If I recall correctly, what I said was that the availability of HD will likely result in more time for it to gain value, if it is still readily available at retail. I own a few of these myself (5 to be exact), so it would be contradictory for me to say that it was a poor investment if I`ve happily purchased some. They will be a good investment in my opinion, so if something I wrote has been interpreted differently, then I`m sorry. Lord of the Rings will likely be very good, and HD & Orc Forge are probably going to be the front runners for the theme.
2) Also, I don`t believe said, and certainly did not intend to communicate that just because a set (specifically MF in this case) is still around that it would be a poor investment. What I was trying to say is that it will likely take more time to grow in value given the apparent concentration of sets. More time does not go to say it is bad. It just means what it says: more time. And also, I don`t believe sets (specifically VC) will grow to the value that many have claimed in the time many have suggested (I`m referring to people who have said they believe it to be a $200 by this time next near). That could very well happen, but all I was stating is that I don`t believe it to be the case at this point. I`m happy to have those who don`t agree say "I told you so" should this become a reality. Live and learn!
3) I looked back at my previous posts in this thread. Not sure where that idea came from? I never mentioned TRU having a display of any kind??
4) Alright, I own that perhaps my wording was not what it could have/should have been. I am sincerely sorry if what I posted offended anyone or came across as "putting down" or just being a blatant a**hole. It`s a bit of a problem in more way then one when I care about something. Tend to push a bit too hard. That`s not always right, and I am sorry to anyone/everyone that this may have effected. All that I intended was to voice an opinion, respectfully at that, and not to look down on anyone`s choice of investment. I am very grateful for this forum and the community of like-minded (in terms of invests) individuals I`ve come to know here. Honestly, there is no way that I would know 90% of what I do without being a part here. So thank you everyone. It is a learning experience, and by no means do I claim to know more then any given member. Honestly, there`s tons of you guys/girls on here that know way more then me. MF may do very, very well, and I`ll be left eating my socks for not buying any
Please forgive me.
5) No Monster fighters at this point. May change my mind, but everything I`ve said goes to state why I have not purchased any up until this point. HD, I mentioned in this post that I own 5. Wish I bought more to be honest, so may still. I don`t know where anyone got the idea that I disliked these (maybe that`s my poor wording that you mentioned). I don`t think that. They should do very well, and I`ve said it before, and will again: Buy Helm`s Deeps!
This was not intended toward me I don`t believe, but would like to address a couple points from it.
I do not agree with everything stated by Treme. Certainly, I did not intend my post(s) to be a "GOTCHA!! FOOLED YOU" sort of thing. I`ll apologize again if that was how it came across. No one deserves to have their choices of investment slammed in their face, and that is not what I sought out to do. I don`t believe it was what I wrote either, but will own the possibly that my wording was poor.
Hopefully this addresses any ambiguity in my posts for this thread. Please let me know if I`ve missed something, and one last time, I am very sorry if anything I posted offended, angered, or appeared to belittle/criticize others investment in MF or any other theme. Please forgive me if this was the case, and I`m going to try and better word what I`m saying in the future so this does not happen again.