December 14, 201213 yr BrickUltraI'm not aware of a set that retails for 1,000.00 Maybe he is referring to sets in the secondary market?? In that case he would be surprised to learn that many sets carry this price tag.......and his mind would be blown if he saw the current market value of the 10179. Also is there a set with around 100 pieces going for 60.00?? Maybe in Europe lol
December 14, 201213 yr http://brickultra.com/why-legos-are-so-expensive-and-so-popular-npr/ I'm not aware of a set that retails for 1,000.00 Maybe he is referring to sets in the secondary market?? In that case he would be surprised to learn that many sets carry this price tag.......and his mind would be blown if he saw the current market value of the 10179. Also is there a set with around 100 pieces going for 60.00?? Maybe in Europe lolThat is probably what he means. Hell, the 10179 sells for $2000+. LOL
December 14, 201213 yr There is a great thread over on Brickset that discuses how terrible this article is. I would highly suggest reading through it. The article doesn't even answer the question it asks. http://www.bricksetforum.com/discussion/8267/why-are-legos-so-expensive-story-on-npr#latest
December 14, 201213 yr There is a great thread over on Brickset that discuses how terrible this article is. I would highly suggest reading through it. The article doesn't even answer the question it asks. http://www.bricksetforum.com/discussion/8267/why-are-legos-so-expensive-story-on-npr#latestI was trying to be kind. LOL. The article was written in 10 minutes from various internet sources. Certainly not a Pulitzer Prize nominee.
December 14, 201213 yr I was trying to be kind. LOL. The article was written in 10 minutes from various internet sources. Certainly not a Pulitzer Prize nominee. I agree that it's not a Pulitzer Prize nominee, but I just don't think a site like NPR should be posting a news story that is just so factually inaccurate.
December 14, 201213 yr Author I was trying to be kind. LOL. The article was written in 10 minutes from various internet sources. Certainly not a Pulitzer Prize nominee. 6.5 minutes tops ;)
December 14, 201213 yr I was trying to be kind. LOL. The article was written in 10 minutes from various internet sources. Certainly not a Pulitzer Prize nominee. I agree that it's not a Pulitzer Prize nominee, but I just don't think a site like NPR should be posting a news story that is just so factually inaccurate.I'm not familiar with NPR, but there is a lot of crap floating around on the internet. You can write anything you want and people will believe it.
December 15, 201213 yr Author I was trying to be kind. LOL. The article was written in 10 minutes from various internet sources. Certainly not a Pulitzer Prize nominee. I agree that it's not a Pulitzer Prize nominee, but I just don't think a site like NPR should be posting a news story that is just so factually inaccurate.I'm not familiar with NPR, but there is a lot of crap floating around on the internet. You can write anything you want and people will believe it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmx4twCK3_I
December 15, 201213 yr I was trying to be kind. LOL. The article was written in 10 minutes from various internet sources. Certainly not a Pulitzer Prize nominee.I agree that it's not a Pulitzer Prize nominee, but I just don't think a site like NPR should be posting a news story that is just so factually inaccurate.I'm not familiar with NPR, but there is a lot of crap floating around on the internet. You can write anything you want and people will believe it.I look like Brad Pitt.
December 15, 201213 yr I look like Brad Pitt.And I look like Hugh Jackman. Oh, and fire a lazer with my mouth.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAA7F7CDEIw
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.