Jump to content

PayPal Policy Updates and Rate Hikes

Recommended Posts

New Paypal Policy/User Agreement goes into effect on Mar 29, 2017. Full document here: https://www.paypal.com/us/webapps/mpp/ua/upcoming-policies-full?locale.x=en

Contains this:

  • Quote

     

    • We are changing the standard transaction fee for sellers selling goods or services online to buyers outside the U.S. from 3.9% to 4.4% plus the existing fixed fee based on the currency.
    • We are changing the standard transaction fee for in store transactions received from buyers outside the U.S. from 3.7% to 4.2%.
    • We are removing the tier based fees we charge to nonprofits who receive payments from senders outside the U.S. and are charging a flat rate of 3.7% plus the existing fixed fee based on the currency for all such transactions.    
    • We are changing the micropayment fees for in store transactions received from buyers outside the U.S. from 6.0% to 6.5% plus the existing fixed fee based on the currency.
    • We are clarifying that we will assess the $20.00 chargeback processing fee for sellers who win a chargeback but are not eligible for Seller Protection.

     

    And I almost forgot:

     

    Quote

     

    • We are adding a non-discouragement clause for sellers that provides:

    • In representations to your customers or in public communications, you agree not to mischaracterize PayPal as a payment method. At all of your points of sale (in whatever form), you agree not to try to dissuade or inhibit your customers from using PayPal; and, if you enable your customers to pay you with PayPal, you agree to treat PayPal’s payment mark at least at par with other payment methods offered.

     

     

Edited by Phil B
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm... I'm thinking that competition thing isn't working out for us after splitting off from eBay?

In fact, I'm not a lawyer, but I'm pretty sure that last point is asking for a legal fight.  

Basically the monopoly online presence for most sellers is telling their customers that they must present them in a favorable light and not discourage their business.   In exchange, we will let you pay us  top dollar to use our service.

This strong-arm tactic has not fared well for big corporations in recent history. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 
 
  • In representations to your customers or in public communications, you agree not to mischaracterize PayPal as a payment method. At all of your points of sale (in whatever form), you agree not to try to dissuade or inhibit your customers from using PayPal; and, if you enable your customers to pay you with PayPal, you agree to treat PayPal’s payment mark at least at par with other payment methods offered.
 
 

This looks like a response to something. I'm super curious about the incident(s) where a merchant mischaracterized PayPal as a payment method (gasp!) or tried to dissuade a buyer from using PayPal.
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, randrace said:

 

This looks like a response to something. I'm super curious about the incident(s) where a merchant mischaracterized PayPal as a payment method (gasp!) or tried to dissuade a buyer from using PayPal.

If I read it correctly this is trying to say that you cannot charge people a fee for using Paypal on your site if you also have other payment methods that you do not charge for. Likely targeted towards one or more big retailers (although I don't know who) but will potentially affect smaller sellers who claim they need to charge you "Paypal fees" as a buyer (e.g. on BL). Unlikely Paypal will come after those unless during part of a dispute.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, TANV said:

It seems the transaction fees for  domestic US transactions remain the same, right?

That's what I'm hoping.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

PayPal no longer providing buyer protection for "resale" items.

"We are excluding items intended for resale, including single item transactions or transactions that include multiple items, from reimbursement eligibility under our Purchase Protection Program."

I wonder how they will go about determining what falls under this?

 

https://www.paypal.com/us/webapps/mpp/ua/upcoming-policies-full

Edited by brickvoyeur
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, brickvoyeur said:

PayPal no longer providing buyer protection for "resale" items.

"We are excluding items intended for resale, including single item transactions or transactions that include multiple items, from reimbursement eligibility under our Purchase Protection Program."

I wonder how they will go about determining what falls under this?

 

https://www.paypal.com/us/webapps/mpp/ua/upcoming-policies-full

This scummy "company" never fails to surprise me...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, brickvoyeur said:

PayPal no longer providing buyer protection for "resale" items.

"We are excluding items intended for resale, including single item transactions or transactions that include multiple items, from reimbursement eligibility under our Purchase Protection Program."

I wonder how they will go about determining what falls under this?

 

https://www.paypal.com/us/webapps/mpp/ua/upcoming-policies-full

Eliminating "Dropshipper" protection? If so, that could be a plus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With Ebay going away from PayPal anyway, I don't see this as a huge issue.

My only concern would be orders I make from bricklink stores. Currently Bricklink offers no kind of buyer protection other than putting a Non-Sending Seller ding on someone's account, but they leave the buyer to request refunds through their payment source. If PayPal sees that you sell a lot of Lego they may assume that any Lego purchases are for resale.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Shortbus311 said:

My only concern would be orders I make from bricklink stores. Currently Bricklink offers no kind of buyer protection other than putting a Non-Sending Seller ding on someone's account, but they leave the buyer to request refunds through their payment source. If PayPal sees that you sell a lot of Lego they may assume that any Lego purchases are for resale.

I feel like we need "reseller" better defined, because as you said, how is someone's purchase deemed for a reselling?  I can't find any parameters on paypal's website to define that and I'm almost paranoid to ask.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, exracer327 said:

I feel like we need "reseller" better defined, because as you said, how is someone's purchase deemed for a reselling?  I can't find any parameters on paypal's website to define that and I'm almost paranoid to ask.

In my opinion searching for an exact definition in Terms is totally useless.. "NORMAL" ppl do not sell more than 5 sets of LEGO per year. Claiming as unwelcome gifts.. They do not list tens of LEGO sets more to it, if they have like 20 active listings LEGO sets would not comprise more than 4 of them.  surely ebay has skilled programmers and sufficient resources to develop even more complex algorithms.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...